Wednesday, 9 March 2016

Book Review - Cross Bones (Kathy Reichs)

When Avram Ferris, a Jewish trader, is shot in Montreal, forensic anthropologist Temperance Brennan is given a photograph by a mysterious man who claims it holds the key to the murder. The photo is of a skeleton, and as Brennan searches for its identity, she fears she might stumble on a millenium-old secret that could cause worldwide chaos.

First things first, the story's not as melodramatic as I just made it sound. One of the most entertaining things about this story was thinking it was going down the Dan Brown route, only to wrongfoot the reader completely. Cross Bones is pretty innovative in that regard - “brave” is probably too strong a word, as it's not that the book really does anything to subvert expectations, rather it doesn't do a certain thing.

It teases that it's going to feature sinister, ancient conspiracies, with Jewish, Christian and Muslim groups all having a moment in the dark spotlight. Two iconic moments from Christian and Jewish heritage – Christ's crucifixion and the siege of Masada – play a central role in Brennan's investigations, implying that they're going to be central to the story's resolution. Before the story begins, Reichs gives us a detailed timeline of a real Israeli archaeological dig that happened in the 1960s, and the weird aftermath that would have any conspiracy nut in a lather. I won't say how the novel deals with all this, but I imagine some readers will be impressed by the unexpected turn, while others will be sorely disappointed.

But enough about intrigue, let's talk about the more concrete details. First of all, I really liked Reichs's prose. It's very efficient, with no time for purple prose, which is a big turn-off for me. In fact, there are times when the wording feels a little too clipped. Reichs also loves giving single sentences their own line, as if to show that they're really significant.

But she does this so much it loses its effect quickly.

It starts to look a bit melodramatic after a while.

She also loves to end chapters with thunderingly unsubtle teasers for the next chapter. Typically, someone will be explaining something to Brennan, and the chapter will end on something like “What he said next made my jaw drop” or words to that effect. Not only does this get excessive, but it comes off as really unnecessary given we can just turn the page to find out what exactly was said. It's not like we're getting each chapter in weekly installments and are being forced to wait in suspense for the next one.

All these are minor gripes thought. Honestly, I do love the writing in this book. Reichs has a very easy-going style and humour that made up for the slightly convoluted plot. There are number of skeletons involved in the story, and it can get a little confusing trying to remember who's who. At points, she loves to go into excruciating detail about how a skeleton is examined. This isn't surprising given how Reichs is basing this on her own work, but it made me skip over a few pages as I went.

Fortunately, Reichs's characterisation makes up for these dry moments. Brennan gives the profession a very human quality, and her frequent quips stop the book from taking itself too seriously, while also avoiding coming off as obnoxious. We find out a lot about Brennan's life and backstory through occasional tidbits, so she feels well-rounded without having to bury the reader under a tonne of exposition. I also liked her tongue-in-cheek relationship with Andrew Ryan. It's nice to read a crime novel where the protagonist's romance is playful instead of angsty.

Jake Drum was a bit of weak character in my opinion. He spends a lot of time grumbling and holding things back from Brennan, which starts to get a bit repetitive. That was one of my biggest gripes with the book and made the second half a bit of a slog as he features more prominently there.


That said, I still liked Cross Bones over all. It's fun and it has some great character-work, which is always good in a book, and it. I say pick up a copy if you get the chance.

No comments:

Post a Comment